The Paradigm Shift

God doesn’t write books; people do.

This article is yet another dot-connector.

It’s meant to be read slowly. Some of the embedded videos are relevant and worth your time (I will state otherwise below the video description if that’s the case). I will also present some links for further research.

Enough chitchat. We shan’t tarry any longer.

The Wayback Machine

“Call it fate, call it luck, call it Karma, I believe everything happens for a reason.”

Dr. Peter Venkman, Ghostbusters

We’re going to discuss certain events in history that will help us understand our current situation.

What’s happening around us is by no means an accident. Was it all planned? Well, there are no certainties, only probabilities. You’ll have to come to your own conclusions based on your own research. Certainly it would be ridiculous to claim the leaders of the world have no plan at all.

What you really need to do is look at what’s out there and ask questions. Is there any validity to the claim? You can answer this kind of questions yourself and let your instinct be your guide.

Today our research starts with this:

John F. Kennedy’s served as the president of the United States from January 20, 1961 until his assassination on November 22, 1963. Before his death, he gave this public warning to American people and the people of the world.

In his speech he warned the world of a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence. Over the years the conspirators had (even back then) amassed immense military, monetary and political might. Not long after this speech, JFK’s voice was silenced – permanently.

What was he talking about?

Why was JFK assassinated?

Now, a speech like this could have been made by anyone. The difference is, he was the leader of the free world back then, the president of the United States. This should give his words some weight. Many have not heard this speech, and some yet simply dismiss it. I, and many others, decided not to do that.

Asking questions based on this speech can take you down a rabbit hole with many dead-ends, multiple “maybe’s” and only a few definite “yesses.”

Luckily enough, the definite “yes” answers are rather easy to find if you listen closely. Let’s do that next.

George HW Bush gave this speech to American people where he mentioned that the United Nations could come together to create a “New World Order,” whatever that means.

As a side note, if you go through his other speeches, you will hear him mention “something something… a thousand points of light” several times. I wonder what that is.

Back then this didn’t really mean anything. At least not to the public. But then after the 2008 financial crisis we got this video (can’t publish it on the site. WordPress blocks it (should tell you something). Youtube video) where world leader’s (G20) pledged to come together to create a New World Order.

After that point we’ve had multiple public discussions on this topic. Here’s an example:

I don’t recommend watching this video. Just know it, and many like it exist.

Not only that, Australian political leader Dan Andrews has mentioned it on occasion (Bitchute video link).

What is the New World Order? Well, it’s basically the idea that there needs to be a radical change on how the world is run. Everything needs to be connected, including all nations, currencies and even the language. And this whole system needs to be ruled by someone, of course. The New World Order is simply a group of people rising up to the task of controlling everything. A fun and refreshing idea of global feudalism.

But, people caught on to this. Since then, the elite rebranded their fantastic idea and started calling it The Great Reset instead. In their original video (Bitchute video link. Originally from 2016 if I got it right) they claim by 2030 you’ll own nothing, and be happy. The World Economic Forum talks about this quite a bit.

While you’re at it, see the like/dislike ratio. Edit: Youtube is now going to start hiding dislikes on videos 🙂
I don’t recommend actually watching this whole video unless you’re personally interested.

That’s our present time, but it doesn’t quite connect the dots yet. For that we must travel back in time yet again.

I already linked to this video in my previous post, but have a look at it again: here’s the link (Bitchute video link, Dr. Judy Wood’s presentation). It shall serve as a reminder of the times. If you aren’t going to check it, it simply presents some evidence regarding an event that happened on a certain September day a couple of decades ago.

I love watching interviews. Sometimes they do a great job revealing something about certain people. Here’s one of those interviews (4:05->):

Here you can hear both, the former president George W. Bush and John Kerry admit that they (both) belong to a secret club (society) called Skull and Bones.

What makes this perhaps a little extra spicy is that they were political opponents; John Kerry ran against George Bush in 2004 for the position of the President.

You’re free to do your own research into Skull and Bones. What I’m doing is pointing out politicians have publicly admitted to belonging to certain secret societies.

To me, Skull and Bones seems like a mostly harmless boy’s club. They do some pretty weird things, though.

Oh yeah, Skull and Bones like the number 322, for some odd reason. The Georgia Guidestones were erected on March 22nd, 1980.

I’m sure this is just a coincidence. Pay no mind to it.


Enough with the small fry. We all want to hear about the big boys secret societies!

For that we must, of course, take a look at the Freemasons.

Freemasons are a not-so-secret secret society. They exist in nearly all countries on Earth. Some examples are Finland (under the name ‘vapaamuurarit’), The UK and the US.

In fact, it is so not secret of a club that some of their lodges have a Youtube channel if you search for them.

But that’s merely the front. The Freemasons are a secret society. They have their own secret mannerisms and secret meetings and, well, secrets!

We don’t know much about the Freemasons, but we have a list of former presidents of the US who were part of the club.

Perhaps the most famous example is George Washington himself. Yes, he was a Freemason. So he was yet another president who was a part of a secret society (one of many).

You can look into Freemasonry yourself and try to determine whether it is a good or bad thing that some rather powerful people belong to it.

On Freemasonry, the way I see it, the vast majority of members are blissfully unaware of what’s going on in the upper echelons of the club.

It’s a secret club with many secrets, so what exactly did you expect?


I’ve introduced you to two of the many secret societies in the world. These are by no means the only ones, but as you can see, these two alone house (or have housed) rather powerful people in them.

Others you may or may not be interested in are the Bilderberg group, the Club of Rome, The Royal Order of the Seraphim and The Knights of Malta. Heck, why not read up on the history of The Knights Templars while you’re at it. Here’s a relatively dangerous rabbit hole, but only go there at your own peril (I don’t recommend it).

On this topic, there also exists the book called “Pawns in the Game,” by William Guy Carr. You can find and read it for free if you simply search for it online (the link will take you to it as well). I’m personally not too fond of this book as a whole, but parts of it have a certain charm to them.

And with that we’re done researching history into these matters (secret societies). It is up to you to look into the things I’ve mentioned if you want more information.

This was merely the introduction to what we’re going to talk about today.

Order Out Of Chaos

“Without order nothing can exist – without chaos nothing can evolve.”

Unknown

Order Out Of Chaos, or Ordo Ab Chao in Latin, seems to be the motto of the day, and history in general. First there must be chaos before there can be order again.

Now, you can debate whether the chaos is man-made or happens naturally, but out of chaos comes order either way. This is important.

It’s important because the world around us seems rather chaotic at the moment. It also seems that we’re nowhere near being done with the chaos. In order to create something new, you must first get rid of something that is old.

You see, “New World Order” has that counter point to it. There’s also the “Old World Order.”

What do I mean by chaos?

I guess the answer can be found by opening your eyes and looking around you. However, the answer is a bit more complicated than that.

While part of the elite may be able to hide behind closed doors, not everyone who is (are?) pulling the strings can do that. And I’m talking about the biggest scammers in the world: the central bankers.

Here’s a man who continuously keeps talking about these “demons” and “things” (as he calls them):

Keep it up, Gregory.

The central bankers run the world’s largest Ponzi scheme. Money currency is not what you think it is. It has no value, because it is not backed by anything.

Or in other words, the intrinsic value of a fiat currency (currency that is not backed by anything) is 0.

This is not entirely true, as you can look up definitions of Eurodollar, Petrodollar and then look into the DXY.

Even with this being the case, the intrinsic value of a fiat currency still is 0. And all fiat currencies will eventually return to their intrinsic value.

Thanks to our financial system being global this event hasn’t happened yet, but it’s coming towards us at a rapid pace. The more central banks print currency units, the faster they devalue their currencies. This is the case all around the world.

I’ve already pointed you towards Mike Maloney’s excellent series “Hidden Secret of Money” (A must watch!), but there’s also another author that goes deeper into the creation process of the Federal Reserve.

And that author is called G. Edward Griffin:

Perhaps watch this after you’re done reading the article if you’re interested in hearing more.

In his book “The Creature from Jekyll Island,” he describes how the American Central bank was created, and how it is neither Federal or a Reserve. The book also describes how the entire (banking) system is basically a cartel.

First, it is a private institution, not owned by the government (not federal). Second, despite reserve being part of the name… it doesn’t actually do that. Also, it doesn’t help that I’m sure at least one or two people have mistaken “Federal Reserve” to mean a fine brand of scotch.

All they do is print currency (or allow other banks to print currency) and fiddle around with bonds/securities and interest rates. Yes, there is technically more to it, but at the same time, this is basically it. You don’t need to bother learning more unless you plan to work there. (In case you do… for some odd reason… look up Fedguy and Danielle DiMartino Booth)

This was just the central bank in the US, but don’t think for a second central banks around the world aren’t exactly like this.

There’s also the IMF (International Monetary Fund) and Bank of International Settlements, but I won’t go too deep into these here. All you need to know is that these are basically a central bank for the central banks. So a Ponzi scheme on top of a Ponzi Scheme. Peachy.

Why bring up the banks?

Because it affects us all directly and indirectly.

Each time currency is printed, it is done at a cost. As the monetary supply increases, it also causes inflation.

(Note: I understand the argument for monetary velocity as well.)

Governments can take on debt of their own to pay for their funny business, such as social services (and to pay back their loans). This will cause the debt of the nation to increase, and cause more inflation.

Individuals can take on debt. The currency units are printed out of thin air and then deposited onto their accounts. These individuals are then expected to pay back that debt + interest.

Two of the most common purchases with loans are automobiles and houses (+land on occasion). And while it is not necessarily a physical purchase, student loans are also among the basket of things that people often take without thinking about it further.

Now, what happens when an individual fails to pay back their loan? Someone else becomes the owner of the collateral. Someone else being the bank. Over a longer period of time, you can imagine how this could push all of the assets into fewer and fewer hands.

On the other hand, when a person takes a loan to buy a house, or perhaps to study, we’re not talking about a small number. Houses are expensive, and studying can be expensive as well.

This has certain effects on people:

  1. They must work in order to pay back the loan.
  2. They can’t move from the location where they bought the house as easily.
  3. They must also finish their studies or the loan was pointless.
  4. Ergo: their future (and present time) is locked because of the loan.

So, on an individual level currency units are there just to control your behaviour. If you aren’t conscious of this fact, it may end up trapping and limiting your options. One should avoid taking loans as much as possible and only buy what they can afford.

But this is not the society where we live in. People take loans and get in trouble because of it – all the time. And most of us seem to do it to “keep up with the Joneses.” Not worth it.

Much like individuals, countries can get in trouble by being too indebted. But unlike individuals, a nation going bust means the entire country (together with its citizens) is in trouble.

This is what you can expect when a country is close to defaulting on its debt: rising interest rates, a change in exchange rates (due to hyperinflation caused by currency printing), bank runs, a crash in the stock markets (markets can also crash UPWARDSit simply means the ‘gains’ can’t keep up with the rate of inflation), trade embargoes with partnering countries. And as demonstrated in the 1920’s and 1930’s, rising unemployment is to be expected.

You can expect this, because countries will, more often than not, choose to print currency rather than default on their debts. Mostly because they can. (see how individuals can’t… the game is rigged.).

It’s bad enough if one country is in this situation. Take a look at Zimbabwe, Venezuela and Lebanon for examples of this. But what happens when the entire world has tied its economy together using things like the euro- and petrodollar? Oh yes. There’s trouble ahead.

The US debt to GDP is currently at 125.95% according to the US Debt Clock. Japan’s debt to GDP stands at 251.29% according to the World Debt Clock (Japan has the unique feature of owning its debt mostly to its own citizens rather than other nations – good to keep in mind).

From the same website (World Debt Clock) we can learn the world is currently $72,748,555,278,448 in debt. Quite the number. Who’s going to pay for it?

Why do I say all this?

Well, you see, the countries around the world are in a precarious situation. Default on debt or keep printing currency. They can’t realistically pay it all back, so they’ll keep printing, as countries always do, but that’s exactly the problem.

The countries are now entirely dependant on the currency printers – the central bankers. If they stop printing, the world economy crashes due to there being so much debt and leverage in the system.

This means the governments of the world are completely out of the picture. It is the central banks (and their owners) who rule the world.

I’m not certain all politicians fully understand this themselves. Neither do the common folk, for the most part.

Who owns the central banks?

This is a question that requires you do some research on your own. G. Edward Griffin has pointed out some of the people behind it. Perhaps through that route you can start uncovering who the real owners are.

Officially, nobody knows (except the owners themselves). Unofficially, you can make a pretty good guess.

Which companies were allowed to operate at a loss for long periods of time while their competition suffered?

Which companies hold firm monopoly positions in their fields at this time?

Asking questions like this will show you who are closest to the currency printers.

Also, looking into what the companies Blackrock, Inc. and The Vanguard Group, Inc. invest in helps.


While the central bankers may own the world at this present time, they can’t ignore the laws of physics. What goes up must also come down.

The monetary system is fragile at the moment. It will eventually crack. It could happen for any reason. I’m not going to predict when, but let’s just say things aren’t looking good.

We might get a massive stock market crash, and then the final crack up boom before our current monetary system is finished. We might also continue printing currency with no stops, which will also lead to a collapse. So… Collapse is a coming, we just don’t know when, or how.

Here’s a video on our current problems (based on economic data):

Great job, Steven.

But these are merely the monetary problems. There’s are other signs of trouble as well.

The Other Signs of Trouble

“They say marriages are made in Heaven. But so is thunder and lightning.”

Clint Eastwood

Here are some unpopular opinions. It’s alright, I can take it.

I’ll get the most obvious problem out of the way first. The mandates. You can guess which ones I’m talking about. And you’d be correct.

I’ve already pointed this out before, and hinted at it multiple times, but I’ll make it extra and crispy clear this time.

The mandates are unlawful. Go read your country’s constitution. I’m sure somewhere there is a mention about freedom of movement and personal sovereignty; the freedom to choose.

But even if its not there, it still goes against international agreements (and international laws). If you haven’t already, read Nuremberg Code.

Bonus question: Why does the Nuremberg Code exist?

Here is the problem:

You can’t mandate that people participate in a human experiment. That’s as simple as it gets.

It is a human experiment because we have no long term data available. Anyone can come to this conclusion using their head.

But for those who for some reason can’t use their head, I found these two wonderful websites that backup the claim that it is experimental: The American version and the European version. These links will take you to sites where it shows that clinical trials are currently being conducted. It isn’t necessary to see it, but you should know they do exist.

There’s also this video you might be interested in (Bitchute video link). The very same test (PCR) is being used today.

Then there’s this guy:

Yes, I’m talking about Billy Bob and his buddy in the middle (Epstein). Great guy to have as a friend.

And here he is getting pied in the face in 1999:

For decades now he’s been unpopular in the eyes of the public. What changed?

This doesn’t exactly prove anything other than just how “likeable” he and the company he keeps has been throughout the years. Perhaps there’s more to it, but I’ll leave that research up to you.


The other problem I’ll point out is the climate change diddlydoo talk.

Here’s a speech given by Prince Charles at this years COP26:

If you pay close attention to the speech, you can pick up some strange wordings.
I also recommend listening to his other speeches from this event. If you can find them, that is.

Great talk. Fantastic. The event has been so interesting that Boris Johnson and Joe Biden were seen (recorded) sleeping during the speeches.

Here’s a cool graph:

It shows 2000 years of global temperatures.

How is it possible that the Earth was much warmer before in history (and really, not that long ago in the grand scheme of things), when humans couldn’t possibly have meddled with it?

Is it a human caused climate change? Or is it just something that happens naturally?

I don’t have anything against the move towards a more “sustainable” economy. I’m also not claiming the climate isn’t warming up, it obviously is.

I have a problem when the elite call it manmade, and then go on to call this a “green transition.” It has nothing to do with going green.

I’ll explain it in simple terms, using basic biology/chemistry we all learn in lower grades.

This is how photosynthesis works:

Plants take in sunshine, water and carbon dioxide.

When they take these in, they create glucose and oxygen.

So, in its simplicity: CO2 goes in, and O2 comes out.

Removing CO2 from the atmosphere takes away the necessary food plants need to grow and create oxygen for humans and other lifeforms. ALL life is carbon based.

That being said, there are obvious problems with CO2 as well. It isn’t all clean, as they say. But that doesn’t mean we can have zero carbon commissions. That would mean the end of life. There’s a balance there somewhere.

The real green transition would be to plant more green plants. Plants absorb the CO2 naturally. They actually do this in China, of all places (The Great Green Wall of trees). China is also in the process of building nearly 200 new coal plants. Perhaps the Chinese know what they are doing? Just a weird thought.

Here’s a controversial video from the co-founder of Greenpeace (Dr. Patrick Moore):

I’m not a big fan of Greenpeace, by the way.

Why all the climate hysteria? is all I’m asking.

We have a global energy crisis thanks to the overreaction to something that doesn’t warrant it.


I’ll leave this one as the last problem, but it may be the biggest one of them all (other than the economy), and there’s a good chance readers will get upset now if they didn’t already do so before.

I’m talking about organised religion.

Here’s a power pyramid:

The pope and the church have always been above the rulers in power hierarchy. They make their own rules and decide what others should do, based on… what exactly?

No one can claim to be the sole voice of God. God also doesn’t write books; people do. Incidentally, I recommend people go and read the Bible. Yes, the whole thing.

God may be real, but he doesn’t need the church or the Bible to communicate with people. He can do that by himself and on individual basis. Claiming otherwise would mean he isn’t all powerful. If God is real, he has a personal connection to all humans, and he speaks through all of us.

So, what is the point of organised religion? To remind people that God exists? Even the Bible itself says that people shouldn’t worship false idols. What is a Pope if not a false idol? He’s not a God, or even the voice of God. He’s just a guy in a funny dress.

An actual Bible quote:

“For false christs and false prophets will arise and perform great signs and wonders, so as to lead astray, if possible, even the elect.”

Matthew 24:24

Yet, despite this logic that is backed up by the Bible itself, churches do exist. And have existed for centuries (millenia). They also hide secrets and immense stores of wealth. The Vatican is laden with gold. Why? What does a church do with all the gold? They can’t even use it for charity.

Secrets? The Church is one of the longest standing organisations on this planet. They’ve stood where entire countries and empires have fallen. For this reason alone, they must have hidden knowledge in their possession. That’s the only place where parts of our history could have been kept intact.

Moreover, Jesus was a humble man with close to no possessions. Complete opposite of what the Church represents today. And the Church has caused untold amounts of damage over the years, while claiming to do it “for the sake and in the name of religion.”

As a cherry on top, Freemasons claim to be a religious organisation. Think of that what you will.


There are, of course, more problems than what I’ve laid out here. But these are what I consider to be the core problems of today, with the economic machine being the most pressing one.

It doesn’t have to be this way. And things are about to change.

The Golden Age

“They say a person needs just three things to be truly happy in this world: someone to love, something to do, and something to hope for.”

Tom Bodett

What’s currently happening around the world is entirely manmade. Yes, the problems around us are caused by men all around the world. The world itself doesn’t care what humans do while they tread on its surface.

The crises we’re facing aren’t world-ending crises and we will get through this. It’s just one of those times when everybody’s lost their minds.

Unfortunately, all of this will lead to a crescendo and a climax. Our systems will collapse due to all the meddling.

What happens next? Order out of chaos. This is the motto of the elite.

But before we go there, let’s listen to what Prof. Yuval Noah Harari (author of Sapiens) has to say about current events:

Harari goes on to talk about how humans are now faced with a fundamental problem: we will soon have the power to re-engineer our bodies and brains using genetic engineering, or by directly connecting brains to computers, or we can soon create non-organic entities (artificial intelligence) that will far surpass our own human capabilities.

It is a real problem that should be taken seriously. We will, indeed, sooner rather than later be able to do all of these things. And we need to figure out how to do it properly before we get there.

He goes on to say that the social platforms that we use (Twitter, Facebook (now Meta) and Instagram for example) aren’t really used for what people think they are used for. They are data harvesting platforms, from the point of view of those who created them. And those who control all the data, will end up controlling the world. If it’s free, you are the product.

But it doesn’t end there. Harari says that our current world events have opened the door to even more intrusive idea of data harvesting: biometric data collection. This is where the surveillance goes under our skin.

Imagine if someone knows exactly what is going on in your body at all times, they know where you are located and what you just said. Next step would be to know what you’re thinking, at all times. Elon Musk’s Neuralink seems to want to accomplish just that.

Here’s a video on “Meta” and “Metaverse”:

Keep it up, George.

This is not to say that this kind of technology doesn’t have its advantages. It’s obviously kind of cool and helpful, but people really need to pay attention to who owns all of the data, and do they really have your best interest in mind?

If we want to move forward with these ideas, we must think of better ways to do it. In the future (and even now) whoever owns all the data rules the world. So, people must own their own data, or it must all be made public so that nobody owns it. These are the two realistic options. We should have options for both, and why not a third option for third-party controlled data collection.

You do not want a foreign entity controlling all of your data. Can you trust them? Your data can be used against you. And even if you trust the foreign entity isn’t malicious, just think of what a hacker can do with such information.

Here’s Dr. Michio Kaku talking about the Dark Side of Technology:

Dr. Kaku goes on to talk about “wild cards” that come with the modern technology: weaponized ‘engineered’ viruses, affordable lifeform manipulation, uranium enriching through new methods, and of course the threat of global warming that could end up in nuclear wars between nations (due to movement of people).

All of these are valid concerns that could happen between now and then.

In the next video he talks about nanotechnology:

Dr. Kaku talks about nanotechnology and what it can offer in the future (if we get there). The idea he brings up is the perfect utopia where there exists no scarcity due to ‘replicators.’

The replicator is a technology called molecular assembler. It can take units apart on a molecular/atomic level and then re-assemble them together. You could for example take apart a potato and create a tomato out of it, or you could create wood out of glass.

This is possible with nanotechnology (not now, but in the future, yes). It would also mean that the under-the-skin surveillance technology is rather pointless in terms of real progress, even if it comes with some advantages.

And this is not science fiction. We already have such a tool at our disposal in nature. How are people born if not through molecular assembly?

Finally, there’s this video:

Dr. Kaku mentions Type 0, 1, 2 and 3 civilizations (there’s possibly also a Type 4 civilization, and perhaps 5?). We’re currently a Type 0 civilization on our way to becoming Type 1 status: a planetary civilization.

This is a planetary civilization: one world language, one world currency and one world culture. Sounds familiar?

Yes! It’s the plan of the global elite. To unite all of the nations, and then rule over them. Except, this type (Type 1) of civilization doesn’t require a singular ruler.

That’s right. Their model is outdated.

What Dr. Kaku is talking about is the transition period between Type 0 and Type 1 civilization. This is the first time in history when the civilization can commit a planetary suicide through nuclear wars and global pandemics. If they fail to unite, it’s bye bye to the hopes of reaching Type 1 civilization status. We might as well head back to the stone age at that point.


This simply means that there are two forces at play in the world right now: the truly multicultural, scientific and tolerant force and then the dogmatic, unscientific, monocultural force.

The global elite, from what I gather, are a dogmatic and monocultural force (we can have a debate about the scientific part) attempting to create a united and multicultural world. See, it doesn’t make sense.

Whether they understand it or not, their plan will fail precisely because it doesn’t make sense. Their goals do not match with what they are doing. Even the global elite can’t fight this change.

It is possible that all of our systems will fail, and then all the countries in the world will be asked to unite as one under one rulership. This is exactly what was predicted in the Bible (see Revelations). How exactly do you think it’s going to work for a small number of ruling elites when they unite the whole world?

There are certain rules in the universe, and no one can escape them. Yin and yang (see dualism). Good and bad (evil). The universe is always trying to strike a balance. When the pendulum swings too much in one direction, it will eventually make a swing back in the other direction.

What you need to know is that there are tens of millions, perhaps hundreds of millions of people who are aware of what’s really going on in the world. Silently, slowly, a new kind of golden age for humanity is being constructed behind the curtains. Before it can be unveiled, the old system must fail first.

I’m not saying you should “trust the plan,” because there is no such thing. There is no plan; there are plans. You should have one too, because it’s going to get rocky for the time being. But know that if you have a plan, you have everything to look forward to.

Oh and, while I say this, I also acknowledge this: the universe, or you may call it God if you like, most certainly has a plan, too. There’s no need to worry.

Here’s one last video:

3 thoughts on “The Paradigm Shift

    1. Ah, don’t worry about it too much. It’s a scary thought at first, but once you get used to it, it starts to get funny.

      You’re right, though. Most will not believe it until it’s too late.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: